I was sent this picture this morning, asking "Whatcha think of this?" Then I saw this: "CDFW is seeking public review of a proposed 20-fathom Rockfish Conservation Area (RCA) boundary line. The proposed line will allow commercial and recreational groundfish fishing in shallow waters, providing access to most nearshore rockfish while also minimizing catch and release of quillback rockfish, which may not be retained in California as of 2023.
The Draft Groundfish Management Boundaries web page provides access to a zoomable map with the proposed 20-fathom RCA boundary line, and instructions on how to provide comments. The comment period is open until Saturday December 23, 2023 at 11:59 p.m. PST.
An RCA line is a series of individual waypoints defined by latitude and longitude. When connected, the waypoints create a boundary line that approximates a specific depth contour. The proposed RCA boundary line will extend over waters that are both shallower and deeper than 20 fathoms, but should generally approximate that depth.
This 20-fathom RCA boundary line will be implemented through upcoming state rulemaking in anticipation of new 2024 recreational and commercial regulations being developed for groundfish fisheries. While the proposed boundary line is being developed statewide, it will likely be implemented in Groundfish Management Areas where quillback rockfish most commonly occur.
Currently, the shallowest available RCA boundary line off California is the federal 30-fathom RCA boundary line. The new, proposed 20-fathom RCA boundary line for state regulations has been developed so that it does not cross or intersect with the federal 30-fathom boundary line.
CDFW is asking recreational anglers and commercial fishermen to review and recommend any needed revisions to waypoints that could provide access to shallow nearshore fishing grounds while also generally approximating the 20-fathom depth contour. The waypoints for the proposed 20-fathom RCA boundary line must also fall entirely within state waters (which is depicted in the map viewer). It is also desirable to have fewer waypoints to reduce regulatory complexity and increase ease of use.
Your review and input concerning this proposed line is very much appreciated. With feedback from the fishing community, CDFW hopes the new 20-fathom RCA boundary line will allow commercial and recreational groundfish fishing in shallower waters in the new year."
So, what do I think? If it gives us a nearshore season, I'm for it. Anybody that boohoos about it must be too young to remember when we could only fish in 120 feet of water or less. It wasn't that long ago. This millennium. It sucked, but not fishing sucks more (ask a salmon fisherman). So, I'm for it, if it means I get to fish. I found a few spots way back when, and I can work them again. Will it suck? Yes. Will it suck and still be better than not fishing? Yes, yes, yes. There's places where you can catch inside of 120 feet. It takes some searching and effort. Probably you'll only catch a few. But it's better than sitting on a couch.
4 comments:
Yup, I sent that to ya in hopes of you reaching out to the broader community of fishermen. Thank you for doing that and for voicing your thoughts. Appreciated as always. I’m afraid those in power are destroying California fisheries in general. They seem to think fishing is a stocked hatchery raised trout pond they can charge $20 to fish at with a couple free fish days a year. Dammit ! It’s all so screwed up.
If it means we can stop sweating over the difference between an olive and a yellowtail then it's a good thing.
We only fish bottom fish in less water than 120 feet. I would be very happy with that. Many times we limit on good grade fish in under 100 feet. I know these aren't the monsters people have been hammering at Rittenberg and the like but they suit us just fine. We will do what we can to help.
Outlaw
Thank you for the report Willy !
Post a Comment